Accreditation
Accreditation / Willamette’s Upcoming NWCCU Accreditation Site Visit

Willamette’s Upcoming NWCCU Accreditation Site Visit

Willamette University is undergoing our periodic reaccreditation with the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU). Reaccreditation is a comprehensive evaluation of our institution’s mission fulfillment, institutional effectiveness, educational quality, programs, and practices. It involves a thorough review by external peers who assess our compliance with established standards. We have submitted our Evaluation of Institutional Effectiveness self-study this summer, and will be hosting an external evaluation team for a site visit in October 2026.

What is Accreditation?

Accreditation is a mechanism for ensuring that educational institutions meet a series of standards that ensure quality in its operations and academic programs. Since the United States has no centralized authority over its postsecondary institutions, accreditation is achieved through institutions’ voluntary participation in membership associations that establish criteria, evaluate institutions on that criteria, and approve institutions that meet that criteria (see NWCCU website, “What is Accreditation?”).

Willamette has both institutional accreditation (through the NWCCU) and specialized accreditation for relevant academic programs. You can read more about Willamette’s various accreditations on our Accreditation website.

How Can I Participate in the 2026 Site Visit?

All members of the University community are invited to read recent reports submitted to the NWCCU. This includes the Policies, Regulations, and Financial Review (submitted in Fall 2025) and the Evaluation of Institutional Effectiveness self-study (submitted in August 2026).

Additionally, you can participate in our external evaluation site visit. The evaluation team will visit Willamette’s Salem and Portland campuses October 5-7, 2026. As part of this visit, the peer evaluation team will meet with various campus stakeholders and representatives, and will hold three in-person campus fora.

Staff Forum

Monday, October 5, 2026
11:00 a.m.–Noon
Alumni Lounge

Who should attend: Any full-time or part-time non-faculty employees

Who should not attend: Executive leadership, students, faculty

Faculty Forum

Monday, October 5, 2026
3:00–4:00 p.m.
Alumni Lounge

Who should attend: Any Willamette faculty members

Who should not attend: Anyone who supervises faculty, students, and staff

Student Forum

Tuesday, October 6, 2026
11:00 a.m.–Noon
Alumni Lounge

Who should attend: Any student

Who should not attend: Any non-student University employees


Exit Meeting

The site visit will also include an exit meeting, at which the peer evaluation team provides a summary of its recommendations and findings to the campus community. Faculty, staff, students, and members of the public are invited to attend.

Wednesday, October 7, 2026
10:30 a.m.
Alumni Lounge

Note that this is a brief presentation, and there will not be opportunities to ask questions or provide additional feedback.


Potential Questions

Campus Fora
The goal of campus fora during an accreditation site visit is to get broad perspectives about Willamette and its fulfillment of the NWCCU Standards of Accreditation. These fora are led by members of the external site visit team. The following sample questions represent the types of questions that may be asked by the team, but team members will develop their own questions to guide their understanding of Willamette.

    1. What is working well at Willamette? What makes you proud to work here?
    2. Tell us about the faculty’s roles and responsibilities in student learning outcomes assessment?
    3. Tell us about the faculty’s roles and responsibilities in academic program review?
    4. How do faculty contribute to departmental, academic/instructional, and institutional planning and the review of progress on plans?
    5. How do faculty use data to inform changes to programs, curricula, or instructional techniques?
    6. How do faculty participate in shared governance at the institution? Are roles and participatory opportunities clear regarding input or decision making?
    7. Is academic freedom upheld at the institution?
    8. How is your professional development supported at the institution?
    9. How effective is the faculty performance review and evaluation process for supporting your professional growth and improvement as a faculty member?
    10. If you could recommend changes for improvement at the institution, what would they be?
    1. What is working well at Willamette? What makes you proud to work here?
    2. Tell us about staff’s role in reviewing the effectiveness of your department/service area/unit?
    3. How do staff members contribute to departmental and institutional planning and the review of progress on plans?
    4. How do staff participate in shared governance at the institution? Are roles and participatory opportunities clear regarding input or decision making?
    5. How is your professional development supported at the institution?
    6. How effective is the staff evaluation process for supporting your growth and improvement at the institution?
    7. If you could recommend changes for improvement at the institution, what would they be?
    1. What brought you to Willamette? What other schools did you consider and why did you choose this one?
    2. Where do you get your information about course selection and your progress to your goal?
    3. Do you feel like the information you receive is timely and accurate?
    4. Do you know where to go for help with
      • Academic support (tutoring, etc.)
      • Career exploration or planning?
      • Personal counseling?
    5. What resources at the institution are most important for your progress and your success?
    6. If you have concerns about a faculty, student, or staff member, do you know how to address those? Do you know the institution’s processes for complaints or grievances?
    7. If you could make recommendations to college leadership that would make the institution better, what would you recommend?

Internal Links

External References